Wow! This is impressive. It is very well put together and very professional.
Just a small suggestion about the annotations: At this point, I believe the annotations should be about the sonnet itself, not about the sources, like we did in the annotated bibliography. We should be portraying other critics' interpretations of Donne's sonnet in our multimodal composition.
But other than that, the multimodal aspect of this is very well done.
I'm floored by how well thi8s executed. I think your ideas and annotations here are solid but have to agree with Jeremy about your annotations. The purpose of the annotations is to reflect the poem. I encourage you to stay true to that. The multimodal effect though is superb though.
Wow! This is impressive. It is very well put together and very professional.
ReplyDeleteJust a small suggestion about the annotations: At this point, I believe the annotations should be about the sonnet itself, not about the sources, like we did in the annotated bibliography. We should be portraying other critics' interpretations of Donne's sonnet in our multimodal composition.
But other than that, the multimodal aspect of this is very well done.
I'm floored by how well thi8s executed. I think your ideas and annotations here are solid but have to agree with Jeremy about your annotations. The purpose of the annotations is to reflect the poem. I encourage you to stay true to that. The multimodal effect though is superb though.
ReplyDelete